Fractional factorial design slideshare

Process Improvement 5.

fractional factorial design slideshare

Analysis of DOE data 5. Examples of DOE's 5. A step-by-step analysis of a fractional factorial "catapult" experiment.

fractional factorial design slideshare

This experiment was conducted by a team of students on a catapulta table-top wooden device used to teach design of experiments and statistical process control. The catapult has several controllable factors and a response easily measured in a classroom setting.

It has been used for over 10 years in hundreds of classes. The experiment has five factors that might affect the distance the golf ball travels. Purpose : To determine the significant factors that affect the distance the ball is thrown by the catapult, and to determine the settings required to reach three different distances 30, 60 and 90 inches.

Response Variable : The distance in inches from the front of the catapult to the spot where the ball lands. The ball is a plastic golf ball. Number of observations: 20 a 2 resolution V design with 4 center points. The design matrix appears below in randomized run order. The reader can download the data as a text file.

Note that four of the factors are continuousand one, number of rubber bands, is discrete. Due to the presence of this discrete factor, we actually have two different centerpoints, each with two runs.

What Is a Factorial Design? (Definition and Examples)

Runs 7 and 19 are with one rubber band, and the center of the other factors, while runs 2 and 13 are with two rubber bands and the center of the other factors. After analyzing the 20 runs and determining factor settings needed to achieve predicted distances of 30, 60 and 90 inches, the team was asked to conduct five confirmatory runs at each of the derived settings.

Analysis of the Experiment The analyses shown in this page can be generated using R code. Histogrambox plotnormal probability plotand run order plot of the response. We start by plotting the data several ways to see if any trends or anomalies appear that would not be accounted for by the models. We can see the large spread of the data and a pattern to the data that should be explained by the analysis. The run order plot does not indicate an obvious time sequence. The four highlighted points in the run order plot are the center points in the design.

Recall that runs 2 and 13 had two rubber bands and runs 7 and 19 had one rubber band. There may be a slight aging of the rubber bands in that the second center point resulted in a distance that was a little shorter than the first for each pair. Next look at the plots of responses sorted by factor columns.

Several factors appear to change the average response level and most have large spread at each of the levels. The resolution V design can estimate main effects and all two-factor interactions. With a resolution V design we are able to estimate all the main effects and all two-factor interactions without worrying about confounding. Therefore, the initial model will have 16 terms: the intercept term, the 5 main effects, and the 10 two-factor interactions.

The results of fitting the trial model that includes all main factors and two-factor interactions follow. Source Estimate Std. Use p-values and a normal probability plot to help select significant effects.

The model has a good R 2 value, but the fact that R 2 adjusted is considerably smaller indicates that we undoubtedly have some terms in our model that are not significant.Process Improvement 5. Choosing an experimental design 5. How do you select an experimental design?

Fractional factorial designs 5. Use low-resolution designs for screening among main effects and use higher-resolution designs when interaction effects and response surfaces need to be investigated. The basic purpose of a fractional factorial design is to economically investigate cause-and-effect relationships of significance in a given experimental setting.

This does not differ in essence from the purpose of any experimental design. However, because we are able to choose fractions of a full design, and hence be more economical, we also have to be aware that different factorial designs serve different purposes. Broadly speaking, with designs of resolution three, and sometimes four, we seek to screen out the few important main effects from the many less important others. For this reason, these designs are often termed main effects designs, or screening designs.

On the other hand, designs of resolution five, and higher, are used for focusing on more than just main effects in an experimental situation. These designs allow us to estimate interaction effects and such designs are easily augmented to complete a second-order design - a design that permits estimation of a full second-order quadratic model.

For example, an experiment might be designed to determine how to make a product better or a process more robust against the influence of external and non-controllable influences such as the weather. Experiments might be designed to troubleshoot a process, to determine bottlenecks, or to specify which component s of a product are most in need of improvement.

Experiments might also be designed to optimize yield, or to minimize defect levels, or to move a process away from an unstable operating zone. All these aims and purposes can be achieved using fractional factorial designs and their appropriate design enhancements.Toggle navigation. Help Preferences Sign up Log in. View by Category Toggle navigation. Products Sold on our sister site CrystalGraphics.

Effect of being a girl. Effect of being a boy.

Fractional Factorial DOE Data Analysis Example Minitab

Effect of being in Experimental group Tags: designs factorial girl videos. Latest Highest Rated. Why use it? When should it be used? Treatment experimental or control and Gender male or female. Each combination of treatment and gender are present as a group in the design. In social science research, we often hypothesize the potential for a specific combination of factors to produce effects different from the average effects- thus, a treatment might work better for girls than boys.

Power is increased for all statistical tests by combining factors, whether or not an interaction is present. Gender, treatment condition, ethnicity, size of community, etc. Classrooms, subjects, teacher, school district, clinic, etc. If the F is large,? Whether your application is business, how-to, education, medicine, school, church, sales, marketing, online training or just for fun, PowerShow. And, best of all, most of its cool features are free and easy to use.

You can use PowerShow. Or use it to find and download high-quality how-to PowerPoint ppt presentations with illustrated or animated slides that will teach you how to do something new, also for free. Or use it to upload your own PowerPoint slides so you can share them with your teachers, class, students, bosses, employees, customers, potential investors or the world.

Plackett–Burman design

That's all free as well! For a small fee you can get the industry's best online privacy or publicly promote your presentations and slide shows with top rankings. But aside from that it's free. We'll even convert your presentations and slide shows into the universal Flash format with all their original multimedia glory, including animation, 2D and 3D transition effects, embedded music or other audio, or even video embedded in slides.

All for free. Most of the presentations and slideshows on PowerShow.These designs evaluate only a subset of the possible permutations of factors and levels. Generally, a fractional factorial design looks like a full factorial design for fewer factors, with extra factor columns added but no extra rows.

Using fractional factorial design makes experiments cheaper and faster to run, but can also obfuscate interactions between factors. Fractional designs are typically only used for experiments with two-level factors, as designing experiments with more than two levels per factor can get difficult and messy quite fast. The notation used for the specific combination of factors being tested in a trial uses letters to designate the high or second level of a specific factor. When creating a table of trial factors and levels, the low or first level is designated with a minus sign, and the high or second level is designated with a plus sign.

This becomes important when we start generating the fractional design itself. When we create a fractional factorial design from a full factorial design, the first step is to decide on an alias structure.

fractional factorial design slideshare

That gives us values of:. If the experiment had only three factors, the full factorial design table would look like this:.

Partial/Fractional Factorial Design

Our fractional 4-factor design uses the same table with the same number of trials, but with an extra factor, D. This is where the plus and minus signs come in!

fractional factorial design slideshare

If we had more treatment factors that we needed to account for, but we still wanted to keep the 8-trial model, we could introduce confounding along the lines of:. The Engineering Statistics Handbook has a handy summary table of fractional factorial designs. One of the big drawbacks of fractional factorial design is the potential to miss important interactions. Fractional factorials like Latin and Graeco-Latin Squares will not allow analysis of interactions. The interactions are confounded with other effects.

Question: If the number of runs required for a full-factorial experiment is cost-prohibitive, which of the following experiments would have the same number of variables but fewer runs? Sign up in seconds with the buttons below! Questions, comments, issues, concerns? Please leave a note in the comments below! Your email address will not be published. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Photo by F. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published.Plackett—Burman designs are experimental designs presented in by Robin L. Plackett and J. Burman while working in the British Ministry of Supply. Interactions between the factors were considered negligible.

The solution to this problem is to find an experimental design where each combination of levels for any pair of factors appears the same number of timesthroughout all the experimental runs refer to table. A complete factorial design would satisfy this criterion, but the idea was to find smaller designs.

Paley's method could be used to find such matrices of size N for most N equal to a multiple of 4. If N is a power of 2, however, the resulting design is identical to a fractional factorial designso Plackett—Burman designs are mostly used when N is a multiple of 4 but not a power of 2 i.

For the case of more than two levels, Plackett and Burman rediscovered designs that had previously been given by Raj Chandra Bose and K. Kishen at the Indian Statistical Institute. When interactions between factors are not negligible, they are often confounded in Plackett—Burman designs with the main effects, meaning that the designs do not permit one to distinguish between certain main effects and certain interactions.

This is called aliasing or confounding. InDennis Lin described a construction method via half-fractions of Plackett—Burman designs, using one column to take half of the rest of the columns.

Box—Behnken designs can be made smaller, or very large ones constructed, by replacing the fractional factorials and incomplete blocks traditionally used for plan and seed matrices, respectively, with Plackett—Burmans. By equivocating certain columns with parameters to be estimated, Plackett—Burmans can also be used to construct mixed categorical and numerical designs, with interactions or high order effects, requiring no more than 4 runs more than the number of model parameters to be estimated.

Next sort on columns assigned to any other categorical variables and following columns, repeating as needed. Such designs, if large, may otherwise be incomputable by standard search techniques like D-optimality.

For example, 13 variables averaging 3 values each could have well over a million combinations to search. To estimate the parameters in a quadratic model of 13 variables, one must formally exclude from consideration or compute X'X for well over 10 6 C10 2i.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Extended uses [ edit ] InDennis Lin described a construction method via half-fractions of Plackett—Burman designs, using one column to take half of the rest of the columns.

Testing experimental design with applications in marketing and service operations. Stanford University Press. Design of experiments. Scientific experiment Statistical design Control Internal and external validity Experimental unit Blinding Optimal design : Bayesian Random assignment Randomization Restricted randomization Replication versus subsampling Sample size.

Glossary Category Mathematics portal Statistical outline Statistical topics. Outline Index. Descriptive statistics. Mean arithmetic geometric harmonic Median Mode.A factorial design is type of designed experiment that lets you study of the effects that several factors can have on a response. When conducting an experiment, varying the levels of all factors at the same time instead of one at a time lets you study the interactions between the factors.

When you have a factorial design with center points you can test whether there is curvature in the response surface. However, you cannot model the effect of that curvature anywhere but at the center point. In other words, you can only calculate the fitted values at the corner points and the center point of the design, and thus cannot create a contour plot. You need to have quadratic terms for example, square terms in the model in order to model the curvature across the whole response surface.

This is possible with a response surface design. You can augment the factorial design with axial points to create a central composite response surface design from a factorial design.

A full factorial design is a design in which researchers measure responses at all combinations of the factor levels. Minitab offers two types of full factorial designs:. The number of runs necessary for a 2-level full factorial design is 2 k where k is the number of factors. As the number of factors in a 2-level factorial design increases, the number of runs necessary to do a full factorial design increases quickly. For example, a 2-level full factorial design with 6 factors requires 64 runs; a design with 9 factors requires runs.

A half-fraction, fractional factorial design would require only half of those runs.

FACTORIAL DESIGNS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A fractional design is a design in which experimenters conduct only a selected subset or "fraction" of the runs in the full factorial design. Fractional factorial designs are a good choice when resources are limited or the number of factors in the design is large because they use fewer runs than the full factorial designs.

A fractional factorial design uses a subset of a full factorial design, so some of the main effects and 2-way interactions are confounded and cannot be separated from the effects of other higher-order interactions. Usually experimenters are willing to assume the higher-order effects are negligible in order to achieve information about main effects and low-order interactions with fewer runs.

In a 2-level full factorial design, each experimental factor has only two levels. The experimental runs include all combinations of these factor levels. Although 2-level factorial designs are unable to explore fully a wide region in the factor space, they provide useful information for relatively few runs per factor.

Because 2-level factorial designs can identify major trends, you can use them to provide direction for additional experimentation. For example, when you need to explore a region where you believe optimal settings may exist, you can augment a factorial design to form a central composite design.

The response is only measured at four of the possible eight corner points of the factorial portion of the design.A response surface design is a set of advanced design of experiments DOE techniques that help you better understand and optimize your response. Response surface design methodology is often used to refine models after you have determined important factors using screening designs or factorial designs; especially if you suspect curvature in the response surface.

For example, you would like to determine the best conditions for injection-molding a plastic part. You first used a screening or factorial experiment to determine the significant factors temperature, pressure, cooling rate. You can use a response surface designed experiment to determine the optimal settings for each factor. Central composite designs are especially useful in sequential experiments because you can often build on previous factorial experiments by adding axial and center points.

If the factorial design detects curvature, you can use a response surface designed experiment to determine the optimal settings for each factor. The design points for this experiment are below. Face centered designs are a type of central composite design with an alpha of 1.

This variety of design requires 3 levels of each factor. Augmenting an existing factorial or resolution V design with appropriate axial points can also produce this design. A Box-Behnken design is a type of response surface design that does not contain an embedded factorial or fractional factorial design. Box-Behnken designs have treatment combinations that are at the midpoints of the edges of the experimental space and require at least three continuous factors.

The following figure shows a three-factor Box-Behnken design. Points on the diagram represent the experimental runs that are done:. These designs allow efficient estimation of the first- and second-order coefficients. Because Box-Behnken designs often have fewer design points, they can be less expensive to do than central composite designs with the same number of factors.

However, because they do not have an embedded factorial design, they are not suited for sequential experiments.

Box-Behnken designs can also prove useful if you know the safe operating zone for your process. Central composite designs usually have axial points outside the "cube.

Box-Behnken designs do not have axial points, thus, you can be sure that all design points fall within your safe operating zone. Box-Behnken designs also ensure that all factors are not set at their high levels at the same time. What are response surface designs, central composite designs, and Box-Behnken designs? Learn more about Minitab In This Topic What is a response surface design?

What is a central composite design What is a Box-Behnken design? What is a response surface design?


About the author

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *